SB-53
Technology & Innovation

Artificial intelligence models: large developers.

Enrolled
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
1
4
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Requires large frontier developers to publish a frontier AI framework with mitigations.
  • Establishes CalCompute in the GOA, operable by appropriation; report due January 1, 2027.
  • Imposes whistleblower protections with penalties up to one million dollars per violation.

Summary

Senator Wiener, joined by Senator Rubio, advances a Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act that codifies a state-wide transparency and risk-management regime for frontier AI while launching a state cloud initiative to support safe, equitable AI deployment and governance. The measure creates a comprehensive framework governing the development and use of frontier AI models, defining key terms such as frontier models, frontier developers, and catastrophic risk, and sets a framework for public-facing disclosures, risk assessments, and oversight mechanisms.

Under the act, large frontier developers—defined by substantial annual revenue—would be required to write, publish, and continuously maintain a detailed frontier AI framework on their public website. The framework must describe how national and international standards and industry practices are incorporated, how thresholds identifying potential catastrophic capabilities are defined and assessed, and how mitigations are applied based on those assessments. It also requires plans for independent third-party assessments, ongoing updates in response to substantial changes, cybersecurity measures to protect unreleased model weights, procedures to identify and respond to critical safety incidents, and internal governance structures to ensure proper implementation. Before deploying a frontier model or a substantially modified version, the developer must publish a transparency report detailing the model’s release date, languages, outputs, intended uses, and any restrictions, along with summaries of catastrophic-risk assessments and third-party involvement.

The bill also establishes a mechanism for incident reporting and oversight through the Office of Emergency Services, including a public-facing process for reporting critical safety incidents and a confidential channel for internal risk assessments. Reports of critical safety incidents discovered by frontier developers must be filed with OES within 15 days, with rapid notification (within 24 hours) for imminent risk. The OES would compile anonymized, aggregated annual reports for the Legislature and Governor, while preserving trade secrets and national security concerns. Public records exemptions shield certain reports from disclosure, and the act provides for penalties of up to a million dollars per violation for large frontier developers that fail to comply, with enforcement by the Attorney General.

In addition, the act creates CalCompute, a state public cloud computing framework overseen by the Government Operations Agency and supported by a 14-member consortium, including representation from the University of California and other academic bodies, labor organizations, public-interest stakeholders, and AI experts. CalCompute is designed to advance safe, ethical, and equitable AI deployment and expand access to computational resources, with a report due to the Legislature by early 2027 that analyzes landscape, costs, governance, eligibility, workforce implications, and potential partnerships. The consortium’s establishment and CalCompute operations hinge on budgetary appropriation, and the measure preempts local rules enacted after 2025 that regulate frontier developers’ management of catastrophic risk, consolidating policy authority at the state level. Additionally, the Department of Technology would annually refine core definitions of frontier model and related terms and issue recommendations to align with evolving standards, while the Labor Code provisions create whistleblower protections for covered employees who raise concerns about catastrophic risks, including an internal disclosure process, remedies, and potential attorney’s fees for successful actions.

Key Dates

Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
SB 53 Wiener Senate Third Reading By BAUER-KAHAN
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence
Assembly Committee
Do pass
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate 3rd Reading SB53 Wiener
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]
Introduced
Senate Floor
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Scott WienerD
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Susan RubioD
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 2 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 1
Select All Legislators
Profile
Scott WienerD
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Susan RubioD
Senator
Bill Author

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Scott Wiener
Scott WienerD
California State Senator
Co-Author
Susan Rubio
Susan RubioD
California State Senator
70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/13/2025)

Latest Voting History

September 13, 2025
PASS
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
298340PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Requires large frontier developers to publish a frontier AI framework with mitigations.
  • Establishes CalCompute in the GOA, operable by appropriation; report due January 1, 2027.
  • Imposes whistleblower protections with penalties up to one million dollars per violation.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Scott Wiener
Scott WienerD
California State Senator
Co-Author
Susan Rubio
Susan RubioD
California State Senator

Summary

Senator Wiener, joined by Senator Rubio, advances a Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act that codifies a state-wide transparency and risk-management regime for frontier AI while launching a state cloud initiative to support safe, equitable AI deployment and governance. The measure creates a comprehensive framework governing the development and use of frontier AI models, defining key terms such as frontier models, frontier developers, and catastrophic risk, and sets a framework for public-facing disclosures, risk assessments, and oversight mechanisms.

Under the act, large frontier developers—defined by substantial annual revenue—would be required to write, publish, and continuously maintain a detailed frontier AI framework on their public website. The framework must describe how national and international standards and industry practices are incorporated, how thresholds identifying potential catastrophic capabilities are defined and assessed, and how mitigations are applied based on those assessments. It also requires plans for independent third-party assessments, ongoing updates in response to substantial changes, cybersecurity measures to protect unreleased model weights, procedures to identify and respond to critical safety incidents, and internal governance structures to ensure proper implementation. Before deploying a frontier model or a substantially modified version, the developer must publish a transparency report detailing the model’s release date, languages, outputs, intended uses, and any restrictions, along with summaries of catastrophic-risk assessments and third-party involvement.

The bill also establishes a mechanism for incident reporting and oversight through the Office of Emergency Services, including a public-facing process for reporting critical safety incidents and a confidential channel for internal risk assessments. Reports of critical safety incidents discovered by frontier developers must be filed with OES within 15 days, with rapid notification (within 24 hours) for imminent risk. The OES would compile anonymized, aggregated annual reports for the Legislature and Governor, while preserving trade secrets and national security concerns. Public records exemptions shield certain reports from disclosure, and the act provides for penalties of up to a million dollars per violation for large frontier developers that fail to comply, with enforcement by the Attorney General.

In addition, the act creates CalCompute, a state public cloud computing framework overseen by the Government Operations Agency and supported by a 14-member consortium, including representation from the University of California and other academic bodies, labor organizations, public-interest stakeholders, and AI experts. CalCompute is designed to advance safe, ethical, and equitable AI deployment and expand access to computational resources, with a report due to the Legislature by early 2027 that analyzes landscape, costs, governance, eligibility, workforce implications, and potential partnerships. The consortium’s establishment and CalCompute operations hinge on budgetary appropriation, and the measure preempts local rules enacted after 2025 that regulate frontier developers’ management of catastrophic risk, consolidating policy authority at the state level. Additionally, the Department of Technology would annually refine core definitions of frontier model and related terms and issue recommendations to align with evolving standards, while the Labor Code provisions create whistleblower protections for covered employees who raise concerns about catastrophic risks, including an internal disclosure process, remedies, and potential attorney’s fees for successful actions.

70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/13/2025)

Key Dates

Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
SB 53 Wiener Senate Third Reading By BAUER-KAHAN
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence
Assembly Committee
Do pass
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate 3rd Reading SB53 Wiener
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]
Introduced
Senate Floor
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Latest Voting History

September 13, 2025
PASS
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
298340PASS

Contacts

Profile
Scott WienerD
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Susan RubioD
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 2 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 1
Select All Legislators
Profile
Scott WienerD
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Susan RubioD
Senator
Bill Author