AB-285
Justice & Public Safety
Criminal procedure: protective orders.
Introduced
California
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
0
Key Takeaways
  • Requires courts to issue temporary protective orders when domestic violence offenders are released from prison.
  • Limits post-release protective orders to 180 days to shield victims from contact with former offenders.
  • Allows courts to mandate electronic monitoring of offenders who violate protective orders.
Get Involved

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Progress
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (1/22/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it!
Check back later.
Summary

Assembly Member Ramos proposes extending victim protection in domestic violence and sex offense cases through mandatory post-release protective orders. The legislation would require courts to issue temporary criminal protective orders when defendants convicted of domestic violence or sex offenses complete their state prison sentences. These orders, lasting up to 180 days after release, would protect the same victims covered by the original protective orders issued during criminal proceedings.

The measure establishes specific implementation requirements for these post-release orders. Courts must issue them at sentencing, ensuring they take effect immediately upon the defendant's release from state prison. The orders maintain consistency with existing protective order protocols, including standardized forms approved by the Judicial Council and Department of Justice. Local law enforcement agencies retain responsibility for enforcement, with orders transmitted through established systems within one business day of issuance or modification.

This amendment to the Penal Code creates additional duties for local agencies without state reimbursement, as the changes fall under existing criminal justice procedures. The bill maintains current provisions regarding order precedence, with emergency protective orders taking priority when more restrictive conditions apply to the same parties. Courts retain authority to modify orders throughout their duration based on specific case circumstances.

Author
James Ramos
James RamosD
California State Assembly Member
Community Outlook
No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%
Total Votes: 0
Key Dates
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.
Latest Voting History
No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.