SB-221
Justice & Public Safety
Crimes: stalking.
Introduced
California
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
0
Key Takeaways
  • Expands stalking laws to protect pets, service animals, and emotional support animals from credible threats.
  • Imposes penalties of up to one year in jail and $1,000 fine for stalking violations.
  • Requires mandatory counseling for offenders placed on probation.
  • Allows courts to issue restraining orders valid for up to 10 years against stalking offenders.
Get Involved

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Progress
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (1/23/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it!
Check back later.
Summary

Senator Ochoa Bogh's stalking legislation expands California's criminal code to protect pets and support animals from threats made during stalking incidents. The measure modifies existing stalking statutes to include credible threats against a victim's pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse as part of the criminal offense.

Under current law, stalking charges apply when someone willfully and repeatedly follows or harasses another person while making credible threats intended to cause reasonable fear for the safety of the victim or their immediate family. The proposed changes maintain the same penalties - up to one year in county jail, fines up to $1,000, or state prison time - while broadening the scope of protected entities. The bill preserves existing enhanced sentences for violations of restraining orders and repeat offenses.

The legislation retains key definitions of harassment as knowing conduct that seriously alarms or terrorizes without legitimate purpose, and credible threats as verbal, written or electronically communicated statements that reasonably cause fear with apparent ability for implementation. It continues existing provisions for mandatory counseling during probation and court authority to issue protective orders valid for up to 10 years. While creating a state-mandated local program by modifying the crime's definition, the measure specifies that no state reimbursement to local agencies is required.

Author
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
Rosilicie Ochoa BoghR
California State Senator
Co-Authors
Aisha Wahab
Aisha WahabD
California State Senator
Suzette Valladares
Suzette ValladaresR
California State Senator
Tom Umberg
Tom UmbergD
California State Senator
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly SeyartoR
California State Senator
Roger Niello
Roger NielloR
California State Senator
Melissa Hurtado
Melissa HurtadoD
California State Senator
Bill Essayli
Bill EssayliR
California State Assembly Member
Megan Dahle
Megan DahleR
California State Senator
Steven Choi
Steven ChoiR
California State Senator
Phillip Chen
Phillip ChenR
California State Assembly Member
Jesse Arreguin
Jesse ArreguinD
California State Senator
Marie Alvarado-Gil
Marie Alvarado-GilD
California State Senator
Community Outlook
No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%
Total Votes: 0
Key Dates
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Senate Floor
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Latest Voting History
No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.