AB-358
Consumer Protection
Criminal procedure: privacy.
Introduced
California
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
0
Key Takeaways
  • Expands law enforcement access to electronic devices found with deceased persons to determine cause of death.
  • Allows victims of unauthorized tracking to grant police access to devices used to monitor them.
  • Requires government agencies to have good faith belief devices belong to deceased before accessing data.
  • Mandates specific consent from individuals who find tracking devices on their property.
Get Involved

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Progress
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (1/30/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it!
Check back later.
Summary

Assembly Member Alvarez proposes expanding government access to electronic device information in two specific scenarios under California's Electronic Communications Privacy Act. The legislation permits authorities to examine devices found with deceased individuals when reasonably believed to belong to the decedent, solely to determine cause of death or identify next of kin. It also allows access when someone discovers a device in their residence, vehicle, or personal property that they believe was used to track or record them without permission.

The measure adds these provisions while maintaining existing requirements that generally prohibit government entities from accessing electronic communications or device data without a warrant, wiretap order, or subpoena. Current law already permits access in emergencies involving danger of death or serious injury, with the specific consent of the device's authorized possessor, or when devices are reported lost or stolen.

Under both new scenarios, the bill includes procedural safeguards. For devices found with deceased persons, authorities must have a good faith belief the device belonged to the decedent. In cases of suspected unauthorized surveillance, access requires explicit consent from the individual who located the device. The legislation preserves existing protections requiring that any information obtained unrelated to these specific purposes must be sealed and cannot be further reviewed without a court order.

Author
David Alvarez
David AlvarezD
California State Assembly Member
Community Outlook
No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%
Total Votes: 0
Key Dates
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.
Latest Voting History
No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.