AB-633
Justice & Public Safety

Human trafficking: vacatur relief for victims.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Expands court relief for human trafficking victims under 18 to clear any criminal offenses from their records.
  • Requires victims to prove their offense was directly caused by being trafficked to receive relief.
  • Mandates courts to seal and destroy all records within one year if relief is granted.
  • Allows victims to petition for relief at any time after escaping trafficking with no deadline.

Summary

Assembly Member Krell's proposal to amend California's human trafficking vacatur relief law extends protections to individuals who committed any offense while under age 18 and being trafficked. The current law permits victims of human trafficking to petition courts to vacate nonviolent convictions that directly resulted from their trafficking situation.

Under the amended provisions, petitioners must demonstrate through clear and convincing evidence that their arrest or conviction stemmed directly from being trafficked. Upon this showing, courts must find the person lacked requisite intent and vacate the conviction as legally defective. The bill maintains existing requirements for petitions to be filed under penalty of perjury and served on relevant prosecutorial agencies, which have 45 days to respond.

When courts grant relief, they must order law enforcement agencies to seal and destroy all records related to the vacated offense. Agencies must seal records within one year of arrest or 90 days of the court order, whichever comes later, and destroy them within one year after sealing. The Department of Justice must notify petitioners once records are sealed. Petitioners may subsequently deny the existence of vacated arrests or convictions, and records cannot be shared with state licensing boards.

The bill preserves current provisions allowing petitions at any time after trafficking ends or services are sought, maintaining confidentiality protections and permitting courts to take additional actions to fulfill the law's purposes. While expanding eligibility creates a state-mandated local program, the bill specifies that no state reimbursement is required under the California Constitution.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 10 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Maggy KrellD
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assembly Member
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Maggy Krell
Maggy KrellD
California State Assembly Member
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/13/2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Expands court relief for human trafficking victims under 18 to clear any criminal offenses from their records.
  • Requires victims to prove their offense was directly caused by being trafficked to receive relief.
  • Mandates courts to seal and destroy all records within one year if relief is granted.
  • Allows victims to petition for relief at any time after escaping trafficking with no deadline.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Maggy Krell
Maggy KrellD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Krell's proposal to amend California's human trafficking vacatur relief law extends protections to individuals who committed any offense while under age 18 and being trafficked. The current law permits victims of human trafficking to petition courts to vacate nonviolent convictions that directly resulted from their trafficking situation.

Under the amended provisions, petitioners must demonstrate through clear and convincing evidence that their arrest or conviction stemmed directly from being trafficked. Upon this showing, courts must find the person lacked requisite intent and vacate the conviction as legally defective. The bill maintains existing requirements for petitions to be filed under penalty of perjury and served on relevant prosecutorial agencies, which have 45 days to respond.

When courts grant relief, they must order law enforcement agencies to seal and destroy all records related to the vacated offense. Agencies must seal records within one year of arrest or 90 days of the court order, whichever comes later, and destroy them within one year after sealing. The Department of Justice must notify petitioners once records are sealed. Petitioners may subsequently deny the existence of vacated arrests or convictions, and records cannot be shared with state licensing boards.

The bill preserves current provisions allowing petitions at any time after trafficking ends or services are sought, maintaining confidentiality protections and permitting courts to take additional actions to fulfill the law's purposes. While expanding eligibility creates a state-mandated local program, the bill specifies that no state reimbursement is required under the California Constitution.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/13/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 10 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Maggy KrellD
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assembly Member
Committee Member