AB-690
Justice & Public Safety

Criminal procedure: indigent defense compensation.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Reforms indigent defense contracts to ensure quality legal representation for low-income defendants by 2027.
  • Prohibits flat-fee payment structures for public defense attorneys to prevent financial conflicts of interest.
  • Requires counties to provide separate funding for defense services like investigators and social workers.
  • Mandates contracts align attorney caseloads with national workload standards to ensure adequate time per case.

Summary

Assembly Member Schultz's indigent defense reform legislation overhauls how California counties contract for legal services for defendants who cannot afford private attorneys, establishing new requirements aimed at ensuring adequate resources for effective representation. The measure prohibits counties from using flat-fee arrangements that pay attorneys a fixed amount regardless of time spent on cases, a practice the bill's authors assert creates conflicts of interest that can compromise defense quality.

Beginning January 2027, counties must structure indigent defense contracts to explicitly link compensation to caseload volumes, using recent national workload studies to determine appropriate case limits. Contracts must allocate separate funding for support services like investigators and social workers, while providing mechanisms for attorneys to seek additional resources when cases require more time or expertise than initially anticipated. The legislation requires counties to submit their indigent defense contracts to the Office of the State Public Defender every two years for review.

The measure maintains existing requirements that courts first utilize public defenders when available, followed by contracted attorneys, before appointing other private counsel. It preserves provisions giving court-appointed attorneys and investigators the same access to case information as public defenders, while clarifying that this does not extend to confidential motor vehicle records or subpoena powers. Counties that determine the new contracting requirements create additional costs may seek reimbursement through the state mandate process.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Joaquin ArambulaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Lisa CalderonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Mike FongD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 16 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 4
Select All Legislators
Profile
Joaquin ArambulaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Lisa CalderonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mike FongD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Gregg HartD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Gail PellerinD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Kate SanchezR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Tri TaR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Jessica CalozaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Heather HadwickR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Jose SolacheD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Sade ElhawaryD
Assembly Member
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Nick Schultz
Nick SchultzD
California State Assembly Member
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/14/2025)

Latest Voting History

March 25, 2025
PASS
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
9009PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Reforms indigent defense contracts to ensure quality legal representation for low-income defendants by 2027.
  • Prohibits flat-fee payment structures for public defense attorneys to prevent financial conflicts of interest.
  • Requires counties to provide separate funding for defense services like investigators and social workers.
  • Mandates contracts align attorney caseloads with national workload standards to ensure adequate time per case.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Nick Schultz
Nick SchultzD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Schultz's indigent defense reform legislation overhauls how California counties contract for legal services for defendants who cannot afford private attorneys, establishing new requirements aimed at ensuring adequate resources for effective representation. The measure prohibits counties from using flat-fee arrangements that pay attorneys a fixed amount regardless of time spent on cases, a practice the bill's authors assert creates conflicts of interest that can compromise defense quality.

Beginning January 2027, counties must structure indigent defense contracts to explicitly link compensation to caseload volumes, using recent national workload studies to determine appropriate case limits. Contracts must allocate separate funding for support services like investigators and social workers, while providing mechanisms for attorneys to seek additional resources when cases require more time or expertise than initially anticipated. The legislation requires counties to submit their indigent defense contracts to the Office of the State Public Defender every two years for review.

The measure maintains existing requirements that courts first utilize public defenders when available, followed by contracted attorneys, before appointing other private counsel. It preserves provisions giving court-appointed attorneys and investigators the same access to case information as public defenders, while clarifying that this does not extend to confidential motor vehicle records or subpoena powers. Counties that determine the new contracting requirements create additional costs may seek reimbursement through the state mandate process.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/14/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Latest Voting History

March 25, 2025
PASS
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
9009PASS

Contacts

Profile
Joaquin ArambulaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Lisa CalderonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Mike FongD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 16 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 4
Select All Legislators
Profile
Joaquin ArambulaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Lisa CalderonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mike FongD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Gregg HartD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Gail PellerinD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Kate SanchezR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Tri TaR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Jessica CalozaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Heather HadwickR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Jose SolacheD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Sade ElhawaryD
Assembly Member
Committee Member