AB-1375
Social Services

Consideration when determining child custody: human trafficking.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Requires courts to evaluate human trafficking history before making child custody decisions.
  • Mandates protective measures in custody orders when a child or parent is a trafficking victim.
  • Creates a legal presumption against awarding custody to parents convicted of human trafficking.
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it! Check back later.

Summary

Assembly Member Hoover's child custody legislation requires California courts to evaluate human trafficking considerations before issuing custody orders, establishing new protections for victims and restrictions on perpetrators in custody proceedings.

The bill mandates that courts make independent findings about whether a child or parent is a victim of human trafficking, whether a parent has been convicted of trafficking, or whether a parent caused the child or other parent to become a trafficking victim. Courts must document how custody orders protect children in cases where trafficking victimization is found. The legislation defines trafficking victims as those receiving services from government entities or nonprofits, or those who have received compensation from the California Victim Compensation Board.

When courts determine that a parent has been convicted of trafficking or caused trafficking of the child or other parent, the bill creates a rebuttable presumption that awarding sole or joint custody to that parent would harm the child's best interests. This presumption can only be overcome by a preponderance of evidence. The bill references the definition of human trafficking established in Section 236.1 of the California Penal Code.

The measure aligns with existing Family Code provisions on determining children's best interests while adding specific requirements for courts to identify and address trafficking impacts in custody cases. Courts must implement these changes using current resources, as the bill includes no new funding appropriations.

Get Involved

Act Now!

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Introduced By

Josh Hoover
Josh HooverR
California State Assembly Member
Co-Author
Maggy Krell
Maggy KrellD
California State Assembly Member

Community Outlook

No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%

Latest Voting History

No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Introduced. To print.
Assembly Floor
Introduced. To print.
Introduced. To print.

Relevant Contacts

Profile
Ash KalraD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Damon ConnollyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 14 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 3
Select All Legislators
Profile
Ash KalraD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Damon ConnollyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Bill EssayliR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane PapanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Kate SanchezR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Rick ZburD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Maggy KrellD
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Catherine StefaniD
Assembly Member
Committee Member

Key Takeaways

  • Requires courts to evaluate human trafficking history before making child custody decisions.
  • Mandates protective measures in custody orders when a child or parent is a trafficking victim.
  • Creates a legal presumption against awarding custody to parents convicted of human trafficking.

Get Involved

Act Now!

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Introduced By

Josh Hoover
Josh HooverR
California State Assembly Member
Co-Author
Maggy Krell
Maggy KrellD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Hoover's child custody legislation requires California courts to evaluate human trafficking considerations before issuing custody orders, establishing new protections for victims and restrictions on perpetrators in custody proceedings.

The bill mandates that courts make independent findings about whether a child or parent is a victim of human trafficking, whether a parent has been convicted of trafficking, or whether a parent caused the child or other parent to become a trafficking victim. Courts must document how custody orders protect children in cases where trafficking victimization is found. The legislation defines trafficking victims as those receiving services from government entities or nonprofits, or those who have received compensation from the California Victim Compensation Board.

When courts determine that a parent has been convicted of trafficking or caused trafficking of the child or other parent, the bill creates a rebuttable presumption that awarding sole or joint custody to that parent would harm the child's best interests. This presumption can only be overcome by a preponderance of evidence. The bill references the definition of human trafficking established in Section 236.1 of the California Penal Code.

The measure aligns with existing Family Code provisions on determining children's best interests while adding specific requirements for courts to identify and address trafficking impacts in custody cases. Courts must implement these changes using current resources, as the bill includes no new funding appropriations.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it! Check back later.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Introduced. To print.
Assembly Floor
Introduced. To print.
Introduced. To print.

Community Outlook

No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%

Latest Voting History

No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.

Relevant Contacts

Profile
Ash KalraD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Damon ConnollyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 14 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 3
Select All Legislators
Profile
Ash KalraD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Damon ConnollyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Bill EssayliR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane PapanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Kate SanchezR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Rick ZburD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Maggy KrellD
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Catherine StefaniD
Assembly Member
Committee Member